NAT820: Science and Innovation
Internal Course Code
Comment
Entry requirements
Academic preconditions
Basic knowledge from at least one of the disciplines within natural science or Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology is required. A fundamental understanding of scientific research methods and project management is beneficial.
Course introduction
Expected learning outcome
- Demonstrate knowledge of innovation theory applicable to natural sciences.
- Consider the importance of budgets for scientific projects at a theoretical level.
- Understand and apply business models and market analysis techniques relevant to scientific innovations, and consider supply chain, life cycle management, and intellectual property right.
- Conduct risk analysis and communicate scientific ideas effectively through pitches and reports.
- Utilize tools for ideation, co-creation, and interdisciplinary collaboration.
- Reflect on the ethical implications and sustainability related to scientific innovation.
- Work effectively in interdisciplinary teams to develop innovative solutions.
- Knowledge sharing within a scientific team
- Analyzing the team’s personal and professional competences and how to apply these in scientific teamwork
- Applying tools for project management and collaboration in scientific research
- Planning, implementing, and documenting scientific collaboration processes
- Solution specification through stakeholder analysis in scientific projects
- Solution specification through challenge analysis in scientific contexts
- Assessing the innovativeness of scientific solutions
- Assessing the value-creation aspects, financial and other, of scientific solutions
- Assessing solutions from a sustainability perspective in natural sciences
- Assessing the feasibility of scientific solutions
- Documenting scientific solutions and their value creation potential
- Applying own scientific skills to innovation
Content
- Business model, market analysis, and risk analysis
- My Green Lab: Focus on sustainability and lifecycle assessment in scientific research.
- Economic Aspects: Financial considerations and management in scientific projects.
- IPR: Introduction to intellectual property rights and their importance in scientific innovation.
- Critical Literature Review
Literature
Examination regulations
Exam element a)
Timing
Tests
Portfolio exam
EKA
Assessment
Grading
Identification
Language
Duration
Examination aids
ECTS value
Additional information
The exam is a portfolio consisting of:
- Innovation report (group report): The group report must not exceed 15 pages/36,000 characters (including spaces).
- Individual learning report: An individual submission that must meet the learning objectives.
- Oral group pitchof approximately 15 minutes per group, followed by 10 minutes of questions
To achieve an overall passing grade, all three elements must meet the learning objectives.
The assessment of elements 1 and 2 will take place in connection with the evaluation of element 3. The final grade is given as an overall assessment of all three elements, with each element weighted equally in the final evaluation.
If one of or both of the written reports are submitted, these elements can be included in the re-examination.
Indicative number of lessons
Teaching Method
Planned lessons
Total number of planned lessons: 23
Hereof:
Common lessons in classroom/auditorium: 7
Lectures: Presentation of cases, tools for collaboration, intellectual property rights, business understanding, Green Lab introduction, and pitching techniques.
Team lessons in classroom: 4 - Scheduled student meetings to align on individual contributions, visions, feasibility, and pitch planning.
Team lessons in the field/excursion: 3 - Meetings with company representatives for case discussions (introduction, market analysis feedback, and final solution discussion).
Outside the planned lessons:
Literature search and Review: Groups independently conduct literature reviews to deepen their understanding of the case and scientific background.
Peer feedback: Groups exchange ideas and provide constructive feedback on project progress, enhancing interdisciplinary learning.
Facilitator guidance: Facilitators meet with groups to provide feedback on literature findings, project visions, feasibility, and challenges.
Report writing and reflection: Groups work together to draft a comprehensive group report, summarizing their findings, analysis, and recommendations for the company. Students individually reflect on their contributions and learning outcomes in an Individual Learning Report.
Teacher responsible
| Name | Department | |
|---|---|---|
| Eva Bang Harvald | ebhar@bmb.sdu.dk | Institut for Biokemi og Molekylær Biologi |
| Steffen Bähring | sbahring@sdu.dk | Institut for Fysik, Kemi og Farmaci |